正规网投| -（中国）互动百科

来源：正规网投2024-04-26 17:48

正规网投

国铁集团：节后铁路春运累计发送旅客突破1亿人次******

　　中新网2月2日电据中国国家铁路集团有限公司(以下简称国铁集团)消息，春节以来，铁路春运客流持续回升，1月22日至2月1日，全国铁路累计发送旅客1.02亿人次，同比增加3351万人次，增长48.7%，日均发送旅客931万人次，恢复至2019年春运同期的90%，其中1月26日至2月1日旅客发送量连续7天超千万人次，铁路运输安全平稳有序。

　　国铁集团客运部负责人介绍，节后春运，铁路部门更好统筹新阶段疫情防控和铁路春运重点工作，更好统筹发展和安全，全力以赴打好春运攻坚战，保障广大旅客平安、有序、温馨出行，努力让广大旅客春运体验更美好。

　　一是最大限度安排运力。根据客票预售情况和客票候补大数据，动态优化旅客列车开行方案，最大限度满足旅客返岗需求。针对成都、重庆、武汉、长沙、南宁、昆明至广州、深圳，哈尔滨至北京，兰州至乌鲁木齐等热门方向客流增加的情况，及时采取开行夜间高铁、动车组重联、增开临客、普速列车加挂车辆等多种措施，千方百计增加运力投放，节后日均开行旅客列车近9300列，比2019年同期增长了6.8%，全国铁路单日最高开行旅客列车10600余列，较2019年春运同期增长15%。同时，保持普速列车开行规模，开好公益性慢火车，努力满足旅客出行需求。

　　二是持续提升服务品质。针对节后四川、重庆、河南、湖南广西、陕西等地务工人员集中出行的情况，与地方政府、用工企业紧密联动，大力开行“点对点”务工专列，在进站、候车、检票、乘车等环节开辟专用通道和候车区域，提供全程服务，助力务工人员安全顺利返岗。加大餐饮、供水、保洁等旅途服务保障力度，继续落实好按年龄实行儿童优惠票、便捷中转换乘、网络订餐等便民利民惠民举措，加强老幼病残孕等重点旅客服务，持续提升旅客出行体验。优化旅客乘降组织，动态增加进出站通道数量，深入开展青年志愿者服务活动，强化与公交、地铁等市政交通接驳，打通旅客出行服务“最先一公里”和“最后一公里”。

　　三是保障健康安全出行。严格落实站车疫情防控措施，引导旅客有序分散进站候车，保持安全距离，做好站车通风消毒，积极推广无接触服务，加强旅行健康站车宣传提示，引导旅客全程佩戴口罩，加强自身健康防护，强化路地联防联控，有序做好应急处置工作，全力打造平安健康旅途。春节假期，国铁集团各级领导干部下沉春运一线，带领广大铁路职工加强调度指挥、线路巡查、设备检修等工作，积极应对大范围雨雪天气，有力保障了铁路春运安全和秩序。

　　该负责人指出，从目前铁路12306售票数据分析看，元宵节前后，务工流、学生流叠加，铁路春运客流仍将保持高位运行，部分地区客流高峰将超过2019年同期。铁路部门将根据客流需求，最大限度增加运力，加强旅客运输组织，科学有效应对大客流，在前期安排的基础上，日均再增加开行临客200余列。同时，提示广大旅客朋友，春运期间客流量大，请严格按照车票到发站乘车，加强自身健康防护，共同维护良好出行环境。在列车超员情况下，为保障运行安全，旅客列车将不办理旅客延长乘车服务，对于故意不按照票面到站下车，不符合继续乘车条件的旅客，列车工作人员将劝导其在就近的前方站下车。(中新财经)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.